The Original version is on the left, whereas the Remaster is on the right.Buy Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning – PC – EA EA Play FIFA 23 F1™ 22 Madden NFL 23 Apex Legends Battlefield™ 2042 The Sims 4 Until then, enjoy the following comparison screenshots. I’ll talk more about the differences of the Original and the Remastered versions in my upcoming review. In fact, some custom HD Texture Packs may bring a higher graphical improvement than what this re-release actually achieves. To be honest, this feels more like a re-release and nothing more. However, and as you will immediately notice, the graphical differences are really minor here. Now, this wouldn’t be an issue if the game actually looked better than the original version. Here is a 4K comparison, with the original version on the left and the remastered version on the right.

Again, the visual differences aren’t that great to justify this performance hit, so I really don’t know what is going on here. While my system was able to run the original version with more than 100fps, the remastered version was frequently dropping below 50fps. On the other hand, performance is halved in the remastered version. As you can see, the original version runs with silky smooth framerates at 1080p/Max Settings. And, believe it or not, I had performance issues on this PC system.įor comparison purposes, I’ve also included MSI Afterburner in my screenshots.

In order to capture these screenshots, I used an Intel i7-6700k with 32GB RAM and an nVidia RTX 2070 Super. These screenshots will give you an idea of the visual differences between these two versions on Max Settings.

Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning has just been released and below you can find some comparison screenshots between its original and its remastered versions.

Kingdom of almar reckoning download